Follow Us:

Share:

 

Blog Archive

Archive
<October 2023>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234
Monthly
September 2023 (2)
August 2023 (2)
July 2023 (1)
June 2023 (1)
May 2023 (2)
April 2023 (2)
March 2023 (2)
February 2023 (1)
January 2023 (2)
November 2022 (1)
October 2022 (1)
September 2022 (2)
August 2022 (2)
June 2022 (2)
May 2022 (1)
April 2022 (1)
March 2022 (1)
February 2022 (1)
January 2022 (2)
November 2021 (5)
October 2021 (2)
August 2021 (2)
July 2021 (2)
June 2021 (2)
May 2021 (2)
April 2021 (1)
March 2021 (1)
February 2021 (5)
January 2021 (3)
December 2020 (4)
November 2020 (4)
October 2020 (5)
September 2020 (4)
August 2020 (5)
July 2020 (4)
June 2020 (4)
May 2020 (4)
April 2020 (5)
March 2020 (4)
February 2020 (5)
January 2020 (4)
December 2019 (3)
November 2019 (5)
October 2019 (4)
September 2019 (4)
August 2019 (5)
July 2019 (4)
June 2019 (4)
May 2019 (5)
April 2019 (4)
March 2019 (5)
February 2019 (3)
January 2019 (6)
December 2018 (3)
November 2018 (5)
October 2018 (3)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (5)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (2)
May 2018 (2)
April 2018 (4)
March 2018 (4)
February 2018 (4)
January 2018 (4)
December 2017 (4)
November 2017 (4)
October 2017 (2)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (5)
July 2017 (3)
June 2017 (4)
May 2017 (5)
April 2017 (4)
March 2017 (5)
February 2017 (5)
January 2017 (4)
December 2016 (5)
November 2016 (4)
October 2016 (4)
September 2016 (5)
August 2016 (4)
July 2016 (4)
June 2016 (5)
May 2016 (4)
April 2016 (5)
March 2016 (4)
February 2016 (4)
January 2016 (4)
December 2015 (5)
November 2015 (4)
October 2015 (4)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (2)

Go

 

 

OMVIC Blog: Car Buying Tips

Understanding Negative Equity: the Dangers of Being a Monthly Payment Junkie

Aug 29


Tuesday, August 29, 2017  RssIcon


Vehicles that would have been completely unaffordable two decades ago are now financially accessible. Many consumers can buy the car of their dreams, with no money down, for a monthly, bi-weekly (or even daily) payment that has somehow become “affordable.” But how? Did cars get cheaper? Are we all significantly wealthier? Or is something else at play?


For many, this is a direct result of historic low interest rates combined with extended repayment terms (e.g. 84-96-108 months). Not long ago, 48-60 month car loans were the norm. Today, it’s common for consumers to finance their vehicle over seven or eight years. That’s a significant length of time for a product that begins depreciating the second it’s driven off the lot. It is not without risk.

Consumers who purchase a vehicle based on low payments due to extended-term loans are sometimes referred to as Monthly Payment Junkies. These car-buyers often don’t understand that long-term vehicle financing can set up a cycle of greater and greater debt with subsequent vehicle purchases. Increasingly, consumers are finding themselves “upside-down” when it’s time to trade in and purchase another car.


Being Upside-Down


Consumers who are “upside-down” in a vehicle are said to have “negative equity”—an oxymoron if ever there was one. Both terms simply mean the consumer owes more for a vehicle than it’s worth. Considering how quickly many vehicles depreciate, particularly if they are driven more than average distances (e.g. when commuting) and how often some consumers trade in; financing a car over 84-96 months commonly means consumers must take out a loan for a new vehicle that includes additional funds needed to pay off the negative equity owing on their trade-in.


Here’s an example:


Farah bought a car for $30,000 4 years ago.

She financed it for $366/month over 8 years (96 months) at 3.99%.

Farah drove her car 140,000 km over the last 4 years: now she wants to trade it in on a new car costing $35,000.

Because of her 8 year loan Farah still owes $16,192 on her trade-in.

But because of depreciation and higher than average mileage, her trade-in is only worth $7,000 wholesale. Farah has $9,192 ($16,192 - $7,000) of negative equity.

So Farah will need to borrow $44,192 ($9,192 + $35,000) to buy the new car. Her monthly payment will increase to $538.

In the example above, Farah will now owe nearly $45,000 for a $35,000 vehicle—a vehicle that will begin depreciating as soon as she takes delivery. Obviously this scenario leads to a higher monthly payment (and increased borrowing costs) and if the snowball effect of negative equity is considered it’s a borrowing technique that could eventually prove disastrous. (Imagine what might happen if Farah does the same thing four years down the road).


A Common Problem


According to many dealers more than 50 percent of customers with trade-ins have negative equity.

So before agreeing to an extended term loan for a vehicle purchase, consumers should educate themselves and consider how much they drive, how long they intend to keep the vehicle and how quickly it will depreciate. They need to be aware of the potential pitfalls of becoming a monthly payment junkie.

OMVIC Copyright ©2017

Print