Follow Us:

Share:

 

Blog Archive

Archive
<September 2023>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567
Monthly
September 2023 (2)
August 2023 (2)
July 2023 (1)
June 2023 (1)
May 2023 (2)
April 2023 (2)
March 2023 (2)
February 2023 (1)
January 2023 (2)
November 2022 (1)
October 2022 (1)
September 2022 (2)
August 2022 (2)
June 2022 (2)
May 2022 (1)
April 2022 (1)
March 2022 (1)
February 2022 (1)
January 2022 (2)
November 2021 (5)
October 2021 (2)
August 2021 (2)
July 2021 (2)
June 2021 (2)
May 2021 (2)
April 2021 (1)
March 2021 (1)
February 2021 (5)
January 2021 (3)
December 2020 (4)
November 2020 (4)
October 2020 (5)
September 2020 (4)
August 2020 (5)
July 2020 (4)
June 2020 (4)
May 2020 (4)
April 2020 (5)
March 2020 (4)
February 2020 (5)
January 2020 (4)
December 2019 (3)
November 2019 (5)
October 2019 (4)
September 2019 (4)
August 2019 (5)
July 2019 (4)
June 2019 (4)
May 2019 (5)
April 2019 (4)
March 2019 (5)
February 2019 (3)
January 2019 (6)
December 2018 (3)
November 2018 (5)
October 2018 (3)
September 2018 (3)
August 2018 (5)
July 2018 (4)
June 2018 (2)
May 2018 (2)
April 2018 (4)
March 2018 (4)
February 2018 (4)
January 2018 (4)
December 2017 (4)
November 2017 (4)
October 2017 (2)
September 2017 (1)
August 2017 (5)
July 2017 (3)
June 2017 (4)
May 2017 (5)
April 2017 (4)
March 2017 (5)
February 2017 (5)
January 2017 (4)
December 2016 (5)
November 2016 (4)
October 2016 (4)
September 2016 (5)
August 2016 (4)
July 2016 (4)
June 2016 (5)
May 2016 (4)
April 2016 (5)
March 2016 (4)
February 2016 (4)
January 2016 (4)
December 2015 (5)
November 2015 (4)
October 2015 (4)
September 2015 (3)
August 2015 (2)

Go

 

 

OMVIC Blog: Car Buying Tips

Buying a Car? Beware of The Dangers of Becoming a Monthly Payment Junkie

Sep 23


Friday, September 23, 2016  RssIcon

Negative Equity 2 As consumers we have become accustomed to “immediate gratification,” in part, due to the ready availability of credit. But that doesn’t just apply to seasonal shopping; for car-buyers, vehicles are accessible today (financially) that would have been completely unaffordable two decades ago. Consumers can buy the car of their dreams, with no money down, for a monthly, bi-weekly (or even daily) payment that has somehow become “affordable.” But how? Did cars get cheaper? Are we all significantly wealthier? Or is something else at play?

According to Terry O’Keefe, Director of Communications and Education for OMVIC, Ontario’s vehicle sales regulator, “For many, this is a direct result of historic low interest rates combined with longer repayment terms of 84-96 months.” Traditionally, four to five year car loans were the norm. “Today, it’s common for consumers to finance their vehicle over seven to eight years. That’s a significant length of time for a product that begins depreciating the second you drive it off the lot and it’s not without risk.”

Known as Monthly Payment Junkies, these car-buyers often don’t understand that long-term vehicle financing can set up a cycle of greater and greater debt with subsequent vehicle purchases. Increasingly, consumers are finding themselves “up-side-down” when it’s time to trade-in and purchase another car.

 

Being Up-Side-Down

Consumers who are “up-side-down” in a vehicle are said to have “negative equity” – an oxymoron if ever there was one. Both terms simply mean the consumer owes more for a vehicle than it’s worth. Considering how quickly vehicles depreciate, Negative Equity 1particularly if they are driven more than average distances (e.g. commuters), and how often consumers trade-in; financing a car over 84-96 months commonly means consumers find themselves taking out a loan for a new vehicle that includes additional funds needed to pay off the negative equity owing on their trade-in. Here’s an example:

Farah buys a car for $30,000 and finances it for 96 months (eight years). Farah’s a commuter who drives 35K kms/year. After four years her car has been driven 140Ks and it’s out of warranty, so she decides it’s time to trade it in on a new vehicle that costs $30,000. Because of depreciation (made worse by the high mileage) Farah’s trade-in is worth $8,000 wholesale – but because of her eight year loan, she still owes $16,500. Farah’s up-side-down to the tune of $8,500. That means to buy her new car she must borrow $38,500 - $30,000 (for the new car) + $8,500 (to pay off her trade’s negative equity).

So, in the example above, Farah now owes nearly $40,000 for a $30,000 vehicle – a vehicle that began depreciating as soon as she took delivery. Obviously this scenario leads to a higher monthly payment and if we consider the snowball effect of negative equity (imagine what happens when Farah goes through the same process four years down the road), it’s a borrowing technique that could eventually prove disastrous for many family budgets.

According to O’Keefe, this scenario is far more common than you might think. “Dealers tell us today that 50-80 per cent of customers with trade-ins have negative equity.”

Negative equity and extended-term vehicle financing has just started to show up on the radar of regulators, dealers, lenders and governments as a potential problem. “We’re not saying car-buyers shouldn’t borrow over an extended term – but they need to consider how much they drive, how long they intend to keep the vehicle and how quickly it might depreciate. They need to be aware of the potential pitfalls of being a monthly payment junkie.”

 

For more information visit omvic.ca

 

Connect with OMVIC on social media!


facebook    Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council

twitter@omvic_consumers

instagram   @omvic_official


LinkedIn   Ontario Motor Vehicle Industry Council


omvic www.omvic.ca


cpo  www.ontario.ca/page/consumer-protection-ontario






Copyright OMVIC ©2016

Print